Освободи голову. Экспресс-метод для сохранения ясности ума, улучшения концентрации и развития креативности - Фолькер Буш

59. Rayner, K., et al., So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help? Psychol Sci Public Interest, 2016. 17(1): p. 4–34.

60. Fitzsimmons, G., M. Weal, and D. Drieghe, On Measuring the Impact of Hyperlinks on Reading. 2013.

61. Simola, J., et al., The Impact of Salient Advertisements on Reading and Attention on Web Pages. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2011. 17: p. 174–90.

62. Obar, J., The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.

63. Team, S., Study: 70 % of Facebook Users only read the headline of scienc stories before commenting, in The Science Post. 2018.

64. Gabielkov, M., et al., Social Clicks: What and Who gets read on Twitter. ACM Sigmetrics / IFIP Performance, 2016.

65. Ackroyd, P., The Life and Times of Charles Dickens. 2003: Hydra Pub.

66. Hyman Jr, I. E., et al., Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2010. 24(5): p. 597–607.

67. Mack, A. and I. Rock, Inattentional blindness. Inattentional blindness. 1998, Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. xiv, 273-xiv, 273.

68. Simons, D. J. and C. F. Chabris, Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 1999. 28(9): p. 1059–74.

69. Selective attention test. 2010.

70. Alkureishi, M. A., et al., Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. 31(5): p. 548–560.

71. Schofield, T., J. Creswell, and T. Denson, Brief mindfulness induction reduces inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 2015. 37: p. 63–70.

72. Kreitz, C., et al., Some See It, Some Don’t: Exploring the Relation between Inattentional Blindness and Personality Factors. PLOS ONE, 2015. 10(5): p. e0128158.

73. Craik, F. and R. Lockhart, Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972. 11: p. 671.

74. Souza, A.S., et al., Focused attention improves working memory: implications for flexible-resource and discrete-capacity models. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2014. 76(7): p. 2080 – 102.

75. Annie, A., The Stat of Mobile 2020. 2020.

76. Johnson, S., The beauties of Samuel Johnson, consisting of maxims and observations, moral, critical, and miscellaneous. 1819, Edinburgh: J. Robertson. 304 p.

77. Kipling, R., Kim. 1922: Doubleday, Page.

78. McCormick-Huhn, J. M., C. R. Bowman, and N. A. Dennis, Repeated study of items with and without repeated context: aging effects on memory discriminability. Memory, 2018. 26(5): p. 603–609.

79. Mawby, J., A. Foster, and D. Ellis, Everyday life information seeking behaviour in relation to the environment: Disposable information? Library Review, 2015. 64: p. 468–479.

80. Isikman, E. and L. Cavanaugh, The Effects of Curiosity-Evoking Events on Activity Enjoyment. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.

81. Röd, W., Geschichte der Philosophie Bd. 1: Die Philosophie der Antike 1: Von Thales bis Demokrit. 3 ed. 1976: Verlag C. H. Beck.

82. Lutz, R., Euthyme Therapie. 2009. p. 551–567.

83. Przybylski, A. and N. Weinstein, Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences faceto-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2013. 30: p. 237–246.

84. Ramsey, R. and R. Sohi, Listening to your customers: The impact of perceived salesperson listening behavior on relationship outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997. 25: p. 127–137.

85. Misra, S., et al., The iPhone Effect: The Quality of In-Person Social Interactions in the Presence of Mobile Devices. Environment and Behavior, 2016. 48(2): p. 275–298.

86. Diefenbach, S. and D. Ullrich, Digitale Depression: Wie die neuen Medien unser Glücksempfinden verändern. 2016: mvg Verlag.

87. Brynjolfsson, E., A. Collis, and F. Eggers, Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019

88. Eppler, M. and J. Mengis, The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature From Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. Inf. Soc., 2004. 20: p. 325–344.

89. Schleiermacher, F., Apologie des Sokrates. 2018: LIWI Literatur– und Wissenschaftsverlag.

90. Judd, T., Making sense of multitasking: Key behaviours. Computers & Education, 2013. 63: p. 358–367.

91. Stone, L. Continous partial attention. 2020; https://lindastone.net/about/continuous-partial-attention/.

92. Christakou, A., et al., Disorder-specific functional abnormalities during sustained attention in youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and with autism. Mol Psychiatry, 2013. 18(2): p. 236–44.

93. Zanto, T.P., et al., Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nature neuroscience, 2011. 14(5): p. 656–661.

94. Rottwilm, C. So crashte der Mann von PwC die Oscar-Show. Manager Magazin 2017; https://www.manager-magazin.de/lifestyle/leute/oscars-2017-pwc-mann-twitterte-kurz-vor-der-panne-unerlaubt-a– 1136625.html.

95. Adamczyk, P. D. and B. Bailey. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution, in CHI ’04. 2004.

96. Grundgeiger, T., et al., Effects of Interruptions on Prospective Memory Performance in Anesthesiology. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2008. 52.

97. Monk, C. A., D. Boehm-Davis, and J. Trafton, Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004. 46: p. 650–663.

98. LeGoullon, M., D. Boehm-Davis, and R. Holt, Model-Based Predictions of Interrupted Checklists. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002. 46.

99. Baethge, A. and T. Rigotti, Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands. Work & Stress, 2013. 27(1): p. 43–63.

100. Leroy, S., Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009. 109(2): p. 168–181.

101. Altmann, E. and J. Trafton, Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues. 2004.

102. Bailey, B. P. and J. A. Konstan, On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 2006. 22(4): p. 685–708.

103. Mark, G., D. Gudith, and U. Klocke. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. in CHI. 2008.

104. Kerr, J. I., et al., The effects of acute work stress and appraisal on psychobiological stress