Освободи голову. Экспресс-метод для сохранения ясности ума, улучшения концентрации и развития креативности - Фолькер Буш

4. Middendorff, E., et al., Formen der Stresskompensation und Leistungssteigerung bei Studierenden – HISBUS-Befragung zur Verbreitung und zu Mustern von Hirndoping und Medikamentenmissbrauch. 2012.

5. Urban, K. R. and W.-J. Gao, Performance enhancement at the cost of potential brain plasticity: neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2014. 8(38).

6. Luckner, A., Klugheit. 2012: De Gruyter.

7. James, W., The Principles of Psychology. 2007: Lightning Source Incorporated.

8. Docter, P., Alles steht Kopf. 2015, Walt Disney Studios: USA.

9. Haselstein, U., Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Gertrude Steins Laborexperimente und ihre literarischen Folgen. Poetica, 2017. 49(3/4): p. 256–284.

10. Nolte, K., Der Kampf um die Aufmerksamkeit. 2005, Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

11. Franck, G., Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Merkur, 1993. 47: p. 748–761.

12. Aristoteles, De Sensu et Sensibilibus – On Sense an the Sensible. 2010: Kessinger Publishing.

13. Lorenz-Spreen, P., et al., Accelerating dynamics of collective attention. Nature Communications, 2019. 10.

14. Telzer, E.H., et al., The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence. Neuroimage, 2013. 71: p. 275–83.

15. McDaniel, B. and S. Coyne,»Technoference«: The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women’s Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2014. 5.

16. Toffler, A., Future Shock. 1970: Random House.

17. Scally, A. and R. Durbin, Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution. Nat Rev Genet, 2012. 13(10): p. 745–53.

18. Bohn, R. and J. Short, How Much Information? 2009 Report on American Consumers. 2009.

19. Nielsen. AVERAGE U.S. INTERNET USAGE. 2013; https://www.nielsen.com/tw/en/insights/article/2013/january-2013-top-u-sentertainment– sites-and-web-brands/.

20. Burke, K. How many texts do people send every day. 2018; https://www.textrequest.com/blog/how-many-texts-people-send-per-day/.

21. Techjury. The surprising reality of how many emails are sent per day.2020; https://techjury.net/blog/how-many-emails-are-sent-per-day/#gref.

22. Askwonder.com. How many times are people interrupted by push notifications?; https://askwonder.com/research/times-people-interrupted– push-notifications-163c8n1hc.

23. FAZ.NET, Haseloff bekommt tausende Likes für ein» A«, in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 2021.

24. Wissenschaft, S., Älteste Bibliothek Deutschlands entdeckt, in Spiegel. 2018.

25. Blair, A., Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. 2010: Yale University Press.

26. Hauff, E., Die ›Einkommenden Zeitungen‹ von 1650. Ein Beitrag Zur Geschichte der Tageszeitung. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 1963. 9(3): p. 227–235.

27. Statista. 2020; https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/195096/umfrage/anzahl-neuer-artikel-pro-tag-bei-wikipedia/.

28. Brandwatch. 2020; https://www.brandwatch.com/de/blog/facebook-statistiken/.

29. Benselin, J. C. and G. Ragsdell, Information overload: The differences that age makes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2016. 48(3): p. 284–297.

30. Sicilia, M. and S. Ruiz de Maya, The effects of the amount of information on cognitive responses in online purchasing tasks. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2010. 9: p. 183–191.

31. Phys.Org. Google Boss worries about teen reading. Phys.Org 2010; https://phys.org/news/2010 – 01-google-boss-teen.html.

32. Koroleva, K., H. Krasnova, and O. Günther, ›STOP SPAMMING ME!‹ – Exploring Information Overload on Facebook, in AMCIS. 2010.

33. Bromberg-Martin, E. S. and O. Hikosaka, Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 2009. 63(1): p. 119 – 26.

34. Sandstrom, P. E., An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information Seeking and Use. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 1994. 64(4): p. 414–449.

35. Schultz, W., Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2016. 18(1): p. 23–32.

36. Wittmann, B.C., et al., Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. Neuroimage, 2007. 38(1): p. 194–202.

37. Sapolsky, R. M., Monkeyluv: And Other Essays on Our Lives as Animals. 2006: Scribner.

38. Moreira, P. S., et al., Impact of Chronic Stress Protocols in Learning and Memory in Rodents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 2016. 11(9): p. e0163245.

39. Spencer, J. P., The Development of Working Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2020. 29(6): p. 545–553.

40. Miller, G. A., The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev, 1956. 63(2): p. 81–97.

41. Cowan, N., The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci, 2001. 24(1): p. 87–114; discussion 114–85.

42. Völter, C. J., et al., Chimpanzees flexibly update working memory contents and show susceptibility to distraction in the self-ordered search task. Proc Biol Sci, 2019. 286(1907): p. 20190715.

43. Brady, T. F., et al., Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008. 105(38): p. 14325– 9.

44. Schermer, F. J., Lernen und Gedächtnis, ed. M. von Salisch. 70565 Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.

45. Dyson, M. and M. Haselgrove, The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 2000. 23: p. 210–223.

46. Zickerick, B., et al., Don’t stop me now: Hampered retrieval of action plans following interruptions. Psychophysiology, 2021. 58(2): p. e13725.

47. Ratz, M., et al., Second Screen: User Behaviour of Spectators while Watching Football. Athens Journal of Sports, 2016. 3: p. 119–128.

48. Neate, T., M. Jones, and M. Evans, Cross-device media: a review of second screening and multi-device television. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2017. 21.

49. Brasel, S. A. and J. Gips, Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2011. 14(9): p. 527–34.

50. IQ, F., Mobilgeräte und Fernsehen: Bildschirmhopping. 2017.

51. Cheyne, J. A., J. S. A. Carriere, and D. Smilek, Age differences in attention lapses mask age differences in memory failures: a methodological note on suppression. Frontiers in psychology, 2013. 4: p. 99–99.

52. Risko, E. and S. Gilbert, Cognitive Offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2016. 20.

53. Sparrow, B., J. Liu, and D. M. Wegner, Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 2011. 333(6043): p. 776–8.

54. Tamir, D., et al., Media usage diminishes memory for experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2018. 76: p. 161–168.

55. Liu, X., et al., Internet Search Alters Intra– and Inter-regional Synchronization in the Temporal Gyrus. Front Psychol, 2018. 9: p. 260.

56. Brayne, C., et al., Education, the brain and dementia: neuroprotection or compensation?: EClipSE Collaborative Members. Brain, 2010. 133(8): p. 2210–2216.

57. Dong, G. and M. N. Potenza, Behavioural and brain responses related to Internet search and memory. Eur J Neurosci, 2015. 42(8):p. 2546–54.

58. Delgado, P., et al., Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on