Пол и секуляризм - Джоан Уоллак Скотт
97
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 99.
98
Wenger T. The God-in-the-Constitution Controversy.
99
Gordon S. B. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, 2002.
100
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 101–102.
101
Токвиль А. де. Демократия в Америке. М., 1992. С. 436.
102
Modern S. Secularism. P. 113.
103
Mack P. Religion, Feminism, and the Problem of Agency: Reflections on Eighteenth-Century Quakerism // Women, Gender and Enlightenment / Eds. Knott S., Taylor B. Hampshire, 2005. P. 434–459; Mahmood S. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
104
Mahmood S. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, 2016. P. 43.
105
Al-Azmeh A. Islam and Modernities. London, 1993. P. 12.
106
Massad J. Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan. New York, 2001. P. 51.
107
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge, 2009. P. 118.
108
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 82.
109
Ibid. P. 82.
110
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 85.
111
Ibid. P. 120.
112
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism // Special issue on Comparative Family Law of the American Journal of Comparative Law. 2010. № 58.
113
Ibid. P. 753.
114
Chatterjee I. Monastic Governmentality, Colonial Misogyny, and Postcolonial Amnesia in South Asia // History of the Present. 2013. Vol. 3. № 1.
115
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 23.
116
Mahmood S. Sexuality and Secularism // Religion, the Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference / Eds. L. E. Cady, T. Fessenden. New York, 2013. P. 51.
117
Surkis J. Scandalous Subjects: Intimacy and Indecency in France and French Algeria, готовится к выходу.
118
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 772.
119
Baron B. The Making of the Egyptian Nation // Gendered Nations: Nationalisms and Gender Order in the Long Nineteenth Century / Eds. I. Blom, K. Hagemann, C. Hall. Oxford, 2000. P. 138.
120
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 32.
121
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 51.
122
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 773. См. также: Klassen P. Mentality, Fundamentality, and the Colonial Secular // The Postsecular Condition / Eds. R. Braidotti, B. Blaagaard, E. Midden. London, 2014. P. 175–194.
123
Fanon F. Algeria Unveiled // A Dying Colonialism. New York, 1965. P. 63.
124
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 83.
125
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 123, цитируя Mir-Hosseini Z. Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law. London, 2000.
126
Ibid. P. 168; Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 85–99.
127
Jayawardena K. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London, 1986. P. 4.
128
Ibid. P. 24.
129
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. Chicago, 2015. P. 189.
130
Цитируется во Введении, примеч. 4.
131
Цит. по: Floyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. P. 87.
132
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 245.
133
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. М., 1996. С. 66. Дюркгейм был не единственным, кто это отмечал, ему предшествовал Руссо, за ним последовал Фрейд.
134
Цит. по: Kingsley S. Kent, Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. Princeton, 1987. P. 54.
135
Bloch I. The Sexual Life of Our Time // Its Relations to Modern Civilisation, 1908. P. 534.
136
Dudink S. Masculinity, Effeminacy, Time // Masculinities in Politics and War: Gendering Modern History / Eds. S. Dudink, K. Hagemann, J. Tosh. Manchester, 2009. P. 78.
137
Klinger C. Woman-Landscape-Artwork: Alternative Realms or Patriarchal Reserves? // Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective: Re-reading the Canon in German / Eds. H. Nagl-Docekal, C. Klinger. University Park, 2000. P. 166–167.
138
Nye R. Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. Berkeley, 1998; Fraisse G. Reason’s Muse: Sexual Difference and the Birth of Democracy. Chicago, 1994.
139
Laqueur T. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
140
Barker-Benfield G.‑J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, 1996. P. 127.
141
Ibid.
142
Ibid.
143
Michelet J. L’ Amour // Oeuvres Completes. Vol. 18. P. 61–62.
144
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, 1989. P. 189.
145
Conway J. Stereotypes of Femininity in a Theory of Sexual Evolution // Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age / Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1972. P. 147.
146
Ibid. P. 141.
147
Hollis P. Women in Public, 1850–1914: Documents of the Victorian Women’s Movement. London, 1979. P. 30.
148
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 209.
