Позитивные изменения. Том 3, № 4 (2023). Positive changes. Volume 3, Issue 4(2023) - Редакция журнала «Позитивные изменения»
REFERENCES
1. Adams, R. B., Gray, S. J., & Nowland, J. (2016). Does Gender Matter in Green Management? The Case of Environmental Management Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 137–149.
2. Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
3. Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1996). Nuisance Vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models. Political Analysis, 6(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/6.1.1
4. Bedard, J. C., & Gendron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the financial reporting system: Can audit committees deliver? International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), 174–210.
5. Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Sustainability committees: do they influence sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(6), 351–364.
6. Cameron, A. (2009). Microeconomics using Stata. College Station Tex.: Stata Press.
7. Cho, S. Y., Lee, S. J., & Pae, J. H. (2020). The impact of sustainability committee characteristics on sustainability reporting quality: Evidence from South Korea. Sustainability, 12(2), 703.
8. Deegan, C., Cooper, B. J., & Shelly, M. (2011). The CSR disclosure-performance gap: A research note. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(2), 157–178.
9. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The Performance Frontier: Innovating for a Sustainable Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50–60.
10. Erin, O., Adegboye, A., & Bamigboye, O. (2022). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigeria.
Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3), 680–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06–2020–0185
11. Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Retrieved from: https://respect.international/g4-sustainability-reporting-guidelines-implementation-manual/. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
12. Global Reporting Initiative. (2015). G4 Implementation Manual: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from: https://respect.international/g4-sustainability-reporting-guidelines-implementation-manual/. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
13. Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards: Making sustainability disclosure more effective. Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/what-is-gri/Pages/default.aspx
14. Global Reporting Initiative. (n.d.). About GRI. Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/.
15. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2019). How transparency and communication influence the quality of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–017–3511-y
16. Hidayah, R., Suryandari, D., Nafsi, J., Suryarini, T., Kayati, I., Islamiatun, M., & Zahid, A. (2023). Sustainability Reporting Quality and Corporate Governance. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33 S3(2023), 1651–1668.
17. International Integrated Reporting Council. (n.d.). What is Integrated Reporting? Retrieved from: https://integratedreporting.org/what-is-integrated-reporting/. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
18. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate sustainability in business history: Challenges and opportunities. Business History, 52(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076790903470806
19. KPMG. (2017). The road ahead. Retrieved from: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
20. KPMG. (2020). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2020. Retrieved from: https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2020/11/the-time-has-come-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
21. Lodhia, S., Martin, N., & Rice, J. (2012). Sustainable development and governance in small scale fisheries: a case study of the Chumbe Island Coral Park, Zanzibar. Local Environment, 17(5), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.682683
22. Maroun, W., & Nasr, J. (2018). The Impact of Sustainability Committees on Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551–016–3332–9
23. Orlitzky, M., Rynes, S. L., & Gardberg, N. A. (2017). The objective of socially responsible firms: an analysis of the Fortune 500. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 1–17.
24. Orshi, T. S., Barde, I. M., & Muhammad, M. L. (2022). The Moderating Effect of Ownership Structure on the Relationship between Social Sustainability Disclosure and Value of Nigerian Listed Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(4), 261–282.
25. Orshi, T. S., Barde, I. M., & Muhammas, M. L. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Disclosure and Value of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria: The Moderating Effect of Ownership Structure. NDA Journal of Management Sciences Research, 2(1), 12–25.
26. Orshi, T. S., Yunusa, A., & Okpe, J. U. (2023). Value Relevance of GRI Economic and Ethics/Integrity Disclosure among Listed Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria: The Role of Ownership Concentration. FUDMA Journal of Accounting and Finance Research (FUJAFR), 1(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/fujafr-2023.v1i1.1.96–113
27. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (n.d.). SASB Standards. Retrieved from: https://www.sasb.org/standards/. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
28. Sustainalytics. (2021). Best practices for sustainability committees. Retrieved from: https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-blog/best-practices-for-sustainability-committees/. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
29. United Nations Global Compact. (2014). A Guide to Corporate Sustainability: Shaping a Sustainable Future. Retrieved from: https://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/Ref_Doc_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf. (accessed: 15.12.2023)
A Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Committee Attributes and Reporting Quality in Nigeria and South Africa
Teryima Samuel Orshi, Mohammed Aliyu Yusuf, Oyindamola Olusegun Ekundayo
DOI 10.55140/2782–5817–2023–3–4–92–111
Sustainability reporting is increasingly becoming a core aspect of corporate operations worldwide. This practice offers businesses a platform to exhibit their accountability to society, the environment, and future generations, thereby bolstering their organizational credibility and reputation. In pursuit of consistent policy implementation in this realm, companies are establishing specialized divisions, typically committees, dedicated to sustainable development. This paper delves into the role these structural entities play in enhancing the quality of ESG reporting within Nigerian and South African banks, along with the factors contributing to the effectiveness of such structures. Additionally, it thoroughly outlines the statistical analysis tools employed, making the research design adaptable for data from other cases, including different organizations, countries, regions, etc.
Teryima Samuel Orshi
Faculty of Management Sciences & Undergraduate Research Coordinator, Department of Accounting, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria
Mohammed Aliyu Yusuf
Postgraduate Programmes Coordinator, Department of Accounting, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria
Oyindamola Olusegun Ekundayo
Accounting Software Laboratory Coordinator, Department of Accounting, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria
INTRODUCTION
Sustainability reports are crucial for communicating sustainability performance to stakeholders globally[139], leading to increased transparency and accountability. However, the quality[140] of sustainability reports varies widely across countries, organizations, and industries. A KPMG (2017) study found that only
