Объективная субъективность: психоаналитическая теория субъекта - Дмитрий Александрович Узланер

Rose N. Our Psychiatric Future. The Politics of Mental Health. Cambridge, UK; Medford, MA, USA: Polity Press, 2019.

Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Roudinesco E. Freud in His Time and Ours / transl. by C. Porter. Cambridge, MA; L.: Harvard University Press, 2016.

Roudinesco E. Why Psychoanalysis? / transl. by R. Bowlby. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2002.

Routledge Handbook on Psychoanalysis in the Social Sciences and Humanities / A. Elliott, J. Prager (eds). L.: Routledge, 2015.

Samuels R. Psychoanalyzing the Politics of the New Brain Sciences. L.: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017.

Schwartz C. In the Mind Fields: Exploring the New Science of Neuropsychoanalysis. N. Y.: Vintage Books, 2015.

Searle J. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Shepherdson Ch. A pound of flesh: Lacan’s reading of «The Visible and the Invisible» // Diacritics. 1997. Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 70–86.

Solms M. A neuropsychoanalytical approach to the hard problem of consciousness // Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 173–185.

Solms M., Turnbull O. H. What is neuropsychoanalysis? // Solms M. The Feeling Brain. Selected Papers on Neuropsychoanalysis. L.: Karnac Books, 2015.

Solms M. «The unconscious» in psychoanalysis and neuroscience. An integrated approach to the cognitive unconscious // The Unconscious: A Bridge between Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Neuroscience / M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, S. Arnold, M. Solms (eds). L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 2017.

Solms M. What is consciousness? // Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 1997. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 681–703.

Solms M., Turnbull O. The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Subjective Experience. L.; N. Y.: Other/Karnac, 2002.

Solms M., Turnbull O. What is neuropsychoanalysis? // Neuropsychoanalysis: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Psychoanalysis and the Neurosciences. 2011. Vol. 13. No. 2.

Solms M. The conscious id // Neuropsychoanalysis. 2013. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 5–85.

Solms M. The scientific standing of psychoanalysis // BJPsych International. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 5–8.

Sorokin P. The Crisis of Our Age. Boston, MA: E. P. Dutton, 1941.

Sorokowski P., Sorokowska A., Oleszkiewicza A., Frackowiaka T., Huka A., Pisanskia K. Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men // Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. Vol. 85. P. 123–127.

Stark R. SSSR presidential address, 2004: putting an end to ancestor worship // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2004. Vol. 43. No. 4. P. 465–475.

Stavrakakis Y. Lacan and the Political. L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 1999.

Stubenberg L. Neutral monism // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010 / E. N. Zalta (ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neutral-monism/.

Sulloway F. Freud, Biologist of the Mind. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1979.

Tallis R. Aping Mankind. Neuromania, Darwinits and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. L.: Acumen Publishing Limited, 2011.

Talvitie V., Ihanus J. The psychic apparatus, metapsychology, and neuroscience: toward biological (neuro)psychoanalysis // Neuropsychoanalysis. 2006. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 85–98.

Taylor P. More than half the millenials have shared a selfie // Pew Research Centre. 2014. March 4. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/04/more-than-half-of-millennials-have-shared-a-selfie (дата обращения: 27.03.2016).

The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis: Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial / L. Chancer, J. Andrews (eds). L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

Uexkuell J., von. An introduction to Umwelt // Semiotica. 2001. Vol. 134. No. 1/4. P. 107–110.

Uzlaner D. Perverse conservatism: a Lacanian interpretation of Russia’s turn to traditional values // Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society. 2017. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 173–192.

Uzlaner D., Stoeckl K. The legacy of Pitirim Sorokin in the transnational alliances of moral conservatives // Journal of Classical Sociology. 2018. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 133–153.

Vanheule S. Lacan’s construction and deconstruction of the double-mirror device // Frontiers in Psychology. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 1–9.

Vidal F., Ortega F. Being Brains. Making the Cerebral Subject. N. Y.: Fordham University Press, 2018.

Wallerstein R. S. The concept of psychic reality: its meaning and value // Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 1985. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 555–569.

Warfield K. Making Selfies/Making Self: digital subjectivites in the selfie. On-site presentation at the Fifth International Conference on the Image and the Image knowledge Community. Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany. October 29–30, 2014.

Webster R. Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1995.

Weston D. The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science // Psychological Bulletin. 1998. Vol. 124. No. 3. P. 333–371.

Widlöcher D. Psychic reality: belief or illusion? Psychoanalytic tradition as belief in psychic reality // American Imago. 2006. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 315–329.

Yovell Y., Solms M., Fotopoulou A. The case for neuropsychoanalysis: why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis // The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2015. Vol. 96. P. 1515–1553.

Žižek S. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA; L.: The MIT Press, 2006.

Žižek S. «In his bold gaze my ruin is writ large» // Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock) / S. Žižek (ed.). L.; N. Y.: Verso, 1992. P. 211–272.

Žižek S. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA; L.: The MIT Press, 1992.

Žižek S. The lamella of David Lynch // Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis / R. Feldstein, B. Fink, M. Jaanus (eds). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995. P. 205–222.

Žižek S. Ego Ideal and the Superego: Lacan as a viewer of Casablanca // Žižek S. How to Read Lacan. L.; N. Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006. P. 79–90.

Žižek S. How to Read Lacan. L.; N. Y.: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.

Zupancic A. Philosophers’ blind man’s buff // Gaze and Voice as Love Objects / S. Žižek, R. Salecl (eds). Durham; L.: Duke University Press, 1996. P. 54–56.