Kniga-Online.club
» » » » Марит Киркеволд - Сестринское дело. Анализ и оценка теорий

Марит Киркеволд - Сестринское дело. Анализ и оценка теорий

Читать бесплатно Марит Киркеволд - Сестринское дело. Анализ и оценка теорий. Жанр: Образовательная литература издательство -, год 2004. Так же читаем полные версии (весь текст) онлайн без регистрации и SMS на сайте kniga-online.club или прочесть краткое содержание, предисловие (аннотацию), описание и ознакомиться с отзывами (комментариями) о произведении.
Перейти на страницу:

Heyman, I. (1995). Gеngå hatt till…: Omvårdnadsforskningens framväxt i Sverige. GØteborg: Daidalos.

Hjelm-Karlsson, K. (1987). Omvårdnadsdiagnostik. En litteraturstudie. Vård i Norden, 7(3–4): 417–427.

Holde, L; Kristensen, V.; Guilbert, I.; Langemark, L. (1981). Sykepleieprosessen. Abstrakt begrep eller arbeidsredskap? Sykepleien, 68(6): 4–7.

Holter, I.M. (1987). Critical theory: An Introduction and an Exploration of its Usefulness as a Philosophical Foundation for Developing Nursing Theories and for Guiding Nursing Practice and Nursing Administration. Publikasjonsserie 10/1987, Institutt for sykepleievitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo.

Holter, I.M. (1988). Critical theory: A foundation for the development of nursing theories. Scholarly Inquiry for nursing practice, 2(3): 223–232.

Horntvedt, R. (1974). Sykepleiejournaler og -planer i undervisningen av sykepleierelever. Sykepleien, 61(5): 167–189.

Horntvedt, R. (1974). Sykepleiejournaler og -planer. Arbeidsmåte for sykepleierelever i geriatrisk avsnitt. Sykepleien, 61(4): 124-127

Hoskins, L.M. (1991). What Is the Focus of Taxonomy II? Nursing Diagnosis Axes. I: Carroll-Johnson, R.M.: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, s. 35–37.

Jacox, A. (1994). Toward Inclusiveness of Scope in Nursing Diagnoses. I: Carroll-Johnson, R.M.; Paquette, M. (1994): Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, s. 17–26.

Jacox, A. (1974). Theory construction in nursing: An overview. Nursing Research, 23(1): 4-13.

Jenny J. (1995). Advancing the Science of Nursing. I: Rantz, M.J.; LeMone, P.: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Glendale, CA: CINAHL Information Systems, s. 73-81

Jensen, U.J. (1988). En teori i hånden er bedre end ti i hovedet. Klinisk sygepleie, 4(2): 46–48.

Johnson, D.E. (1968). Theory in nursing: Borrowed and unique. Nursing Research, 17(3): 206–209.

Johnson, M. (1983). Some aspects of the relation between theory and research in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8, 21–28.

Kalisch, P.A., Kalisch, B.J. (1978). The Advance of American Nursing. Boston: Little Brown.

Kalisch, P.A., Kalisch, B.J. (1986). The Advance of American Nursing. 2. utg. Boston: Little Brown.

Kalkas, H. (1981). Den vuxna insuhn-diabetikern i hälsovårdens vårdprocess. Vård i Norden, 1 (1): 7-16.

Kalkas, H. (1982). Teoribildning inom vеrdvetenskap – nursing science. Vård i Norden, 2(2): 78–82.

Kikuchi, J.F.; Simmons, H. (red.) (1992). Philosophic Inquiry in Nursing. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Kikuchi, J.F.; Simmons, H. (red.) (1994). Developing a Philosophy of Nursing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kikuchi, J.F.; Simmons, H., Romyn D. (red.) (1996). Truth in Nursing Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kim, S.H. (1983). The Nature of Theoretical Thinking in Nursing. Norwalk, C T: Appleton-Century-Croft.

Kim, S.H. (1987). Structuring the Nursing Knowledge System: A Typology of Four Domains. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 1(2); 99-110.

Kim, S.H. (1989) Theoretical thinking in nursing: Problems and Prospects. Recent Advances in Nursing Science, 24, 106–122.

King, I. (1971). Toward a theory for nursing: General concepts of human behavior. New York: John Wiley & sons.

Kirkevold, M. (1989). På tide å oppvurdere den praktiske kunnskapen? Sykepleien, 77(2): 4–7, 18.

Kirkevold, M. (1990). Practical knowledge embedded in the nursing care provided to stroke patients. Publikasjonsserie 3/90, Institutt for Sykepleievitenskap.

Kirkevold, M. (1993). Sykepleieteorier, analyse og evaluering. 1. utg. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.

Kirkevold, M. (1994). Omvårdnadsteorier – analys och utvärdering. Lund. Studentlitteratur.

Kirkevold, M. (1994). The contribution of nursing research – knowledge about the patient. Keynote adress, 7th. Biennial Conference of Workgroup of European Nurse Researchers (WENR), Oslo June 3–6, 1994.

Kirkevold, M. (1996). Vitenskap for praksis? Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.

Kristjansdotrir G. (1995). Perceived importance of needs expressed by parents of hospitalized two– to six-year-olds. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 9(2):95-103.

Kristoffersen, N.J. (1996). Grunnleggende sykepleie. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Kritek, P.B. (1982). The Generation and Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Toward a Theory of Nursing. I: Kim, M.J., Moritz, D.A.: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Third and Fourth National Conferences. New York: McGraw-Hill, s. 18–29.

Kritek, P.B. (1984). Report of the group work on taxonomies. I: Kim M.J, McFarland, G.K.; McLane, A.M. (red.): Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference. St. Louis: CV Mosby, s. 46–58.

Kritek, P.B. (1986). Development of a taxonomic structure for nursing diagnoses: A review and an update. I: Hurley, M.E.: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. St. Louis: Mosby, s. 23–38.

Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2. utg. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kvernbekk, T. (1994). In search of the nature of educational theories. Dr. polit. avh., Ped. forskningsinst. Oslo: UiO.

Lang, N.M.; Gebbie, K. (1989). Nursing Taxonomy: NANDA and ANA Joint Venture toward ICD-10CM. I: Carroll-Johnson, R.M.; Paquette, M. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, s. 11–17.

Lashley M.E. et al. (1994). Being called to care. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lather, P. (1987). Research as praxis. I Shadish, W.R.; Reichardt, C.S. (red.).-Evaluation studies: Review annual. Vol. 12. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Lather, P. (1992). Postmodernism and the human sciences. I Kvale S. (red.): Psychology and postmodernism. Inquiries in social construction. London, England: Sage Publications.

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkley, C. A.: University of California Press.

Lauri, S. (1983). Tillämping av vårdarbetets processmetod i barnavårds– og uppfostringsrådgivning med hjelp av verksamhetsforskning. Vård i Norden,3(2): 149–154.

Leine, B.J. (1977). Sykepleieprosessen – problemorientert pleieplan anvendt i operasjonsavdeling. Sykepleien, 64(1): 22–24, 28.

Leininger M. (1990). Historic and epistemologic dimensions of care and caring with future directions I Stevenson J.S. m.fl.: Knowledge about care and caring: state of the art and future developments. Proceedings of a Wingspread Conference. American Nurses Association Publications. American Academy of Nursing.

Leininger, M.M. (1969). Introduction: Nature of science in nursing. Nursing Research, 18(5): 388–389.

Levine M. (1987). Approaches to the development of a nursing diagnosis taxonomy. I: McLane, A.M.: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. St. Louis: CV Mosby, s. 45–52. Lorensen, M. (1986). Mildre og egenomsorg. K0benhavn: Munksgaard. Lundt, U.; Söder, Μ.; Waerness, К. (1988). Nursing Theories: A Critical View. Image, 20(1): 36–40.

Lysnes, M. (1985). Sykepleie – yrke eller fag? Sykepleien, 65(12): 19–25

MacPherson, K.I. (1983). Feminist methods: A new paradigm for nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 5, 17–26.

MacPherson, K.I. (1988). The missing piece: Women as partners in feminist research. Advances in Nursing Science, 5(2): 208–230.

Marriner, Tomey Α.; Allogood, M.R. (1998) Nursing Theorists and Their Work. 4. utg. St. Louis: Mosby.

Martinsen, K. (1970). Om kritikkll. Sykepleien, 57(18): 622–623.

Martinsen, K. (1970). Om kritikk. Refleksjoner etter et forskningskurs. Sykepleien, 57(12): 418-19.

Martinsen, K. (1975). Sykepleie og filosofi. Stensilserie No. 34. Bergen:

Universitetet i Bergen. Martinsen, K. (1978). Teori og praksis i sykepleien – og debatten som har vaert tildekket. Sykepleien, 65(1): 23–25.

Martinsen, K. (1981). Omsorgens filosofi. Sykepleien, 68(9): 4-10, 25.

Martinsen, K. (1984). Freidige og uforsagte diakonisser. Oslo: Aschehoug/Tano-Norli.

Martinsen, K. (1988a). Omsorgsbegrepet I: Ansvar og solidaritet. Sykepleien, 76(12): 17–21.

Martinsen, K. (1988b). Omsorgsbegrepet II: Etikk og omsorgsmoral. Sykepleien, 76(13): 16–20.

Martinsen, K. (1989). Omsorg, Sykepleie, Medisin. Oslo: Tano.

Martinsen, K. (1990). Moralsk praksis og dokumentasjon i prakrisk sykepleie. I: Jensen, T; Jensen, L.U.; Kim, W.C. (red.): Grundlagsproblemer i sygeplejen – Etik, videnskabsteori, ledelse og samfund. Århus: Philosophia.

Martinsen, K. (1993). Fra Marx til L0gstrup. От etikk og sanselighet I sykepleien. Oslo: Tano.

Martinsen, K. (1996). Fenomenologi og omsorg. Tre dialoger. Oslo: Tano.

Martinsen, K.; Waerness, K. (1976). Sykepleierrollen – en undertrykt kvinnerolle i helsesektoren. Sykepleien, 63(4): 220–224.

Martinsen, K.; WjKrness, K. (1976). Sykepleierrollen – en undertrykt kvinnerolle i helsesektoren (del 2). Sykepleien, 63(5): 274–282.

Maslow, A. (1987). Motivation and Personality. 3. utg. New York: Harper og Row.

MathisenJ. (1993). Sykepleiehistorie. Oslo-: Universitetsforlager.

McBride, A.B.; McBride, WL. (1981). Theoretical underpinnings for woman’s health. Women and Health, 6: 37–55.

McCarthy, R.T (1972). A practice theory of nursing care. Nursing Research, 21(5): 406–410.

McCloskey, J.C.; Bulechek, G.M. (red.) (1992). Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). St. Louis: Mosby

McCourt, A.E. (1991). Syndromes in nursing: a continuing concern. I Carroll-Johnson, R.M.: Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the ninth conference. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

McFarland, G.K.; McFarlane, E.A. (1997). Nursing diagnosis and intervention: planning for patient care. St. Louis: Mosby.

McKay, R. (1969). Theories, models, and systems for nursing. Nursing Research, 18(5): 393–400.

Meleis, A.I. (1985). Theoretical Nursing: Development k Progress. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J.B. Lippincott.

Meleis, A.I. (1991). Theoretical Nursing: Development k Progress. 2. utg. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J.B. Lippincott.

Meleis, A.I. (1997). Theoretical Nursing: Development k Progress. 3. utg. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J.B. Lippincott.

Meleis, A.I. (1987). Revisions in Knowledge Development: A Passion for Substance. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 1(1): 5-20.

Mishel, M.H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Image – the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22(4): 256-62.

Mitchell, G.J. (1994). Discipline-specific inquiry: the hermeneutics of theoryguided nursing research. Nursing Outlook, 42(5): 224-8.

Mitchell, G.J.; Pilkington, B. (1990). Theoretical approaches in nursing practice: A comparison of Roy and Passe. Nursing Science Quarterley, 3: 81–87.

Moccia, P. (1986). The dialectic as method. I: P.L. Chinn (red.): Nursing Research Methodology, Issues and Implementation. Rockville, Md: Aspen.

Moccia, P. (1986). The Dialectic as Method. I: P.L. Chinn (red.): Nursing Research Methodology (s. 147–156). Rockville. Maryland: Aspen.

Moccia, P. (1988). A critique of compromise: Beyond the methods debate. Advances in Nursing Science, 10(4): 1–9.

Moch, S.D. (1990). Personal knowing: evolving research and practice. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 4(2): 155-65.

Moore, M. (1968). Nursing: A Scientific discipline? Nursing Forum, 7(4): 340–348.

Morse, J.M.; Solberg, S.M.; Neander, W.L.; Bottorff, J.L.; Johnson, J.L. (1990) Concepts of caring and caring as a concept. Advances in Nursing Science. 13(l): l-l4.

Muller, K.N. (1975). Administrative pleieplaner. Sykepleien, 62(5): 200–207.

National League for Nursing (NLN). (1972). Criteria/or the Appraisal of Baccalaureate and Higher Degree Programs in Nursing. New York: NLN Council of Baccalaureate and Higher Degree Programs.

Newman, M.A.; Sime, A.M.; Corcoran-Perry, S.A. (1991). The focus of the discipline of nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, l4(l): l-6.

Newman, M. (1977). Theory development in nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

Nightingale, F. (1997). Notater om sykepleie. Samlede utgaver. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Nightingale, F. (1984). Håndbok i sykepleie. Hva det er og hva det ikke er. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk forlag.

Nightlingale, F. (1969). Notes on Nursing. Ontario, Toronto: Dover Publ.

Norbeck, J. (1987). In defence of empiricism. Image, 19(1): 28–30.

Nortvedt, P. (1998). Sykepleiens grunnlag. Oslo: Tano

Nyhlin, K.T. (1988). Några reflexioner på omvårdnadsdiagnostik. Vård i Norden, 8(3–4): 477–485.

Omery A.; Kasper, C.E.; Page, G.G. (1995). In Search of Nursing Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Перейти на страницу:

Марит Киркеволд читать все книги автора по порядку

Марит Киркеволд - все книги автора в одном месте читать по порядку полные версии на сайте онлайн библиотеки kniga-online.club.


Сестринское дело. Анализ и оценка теорий отзывы

Отзывы читателей о книге Сестринское дело. Анализ и оценка теорий, автор: Марит Киркеволд. Читайте комментарии и мнения людей о произведении.


Уважаемые читатели и просто посетители нашей библиотеки! Просим Вас придерживаться определенных правил при комментировании литературных произведений.

  • 1. Просьба отказаться от дискриминационных высказываний. Мы защищаем право наших читателей свободно выражать свою точку зрения. Вместе с тем мы не терпим агрессии. На сайте запрещено оставлять комментарий, который содержит унизительные высказывания или призывы к насилию по отношению к отдельным лицам или группам людей на основании их расы, этнического происхождения, вероисповедания, недееспособности, пола, возраста, статуса ветерана, касты или сексуальной ориентации.
  • 2. Просьба отказаться от оскорблений, угроз и запугиваний.
  • 3. Просьба отказаться от нецензурной лексики.
  • 4. Просьба вести себя максимально корректно как по отношению к авторам, так и по отношению к другим читателям и их комментариям.

Надеемся на Ваше понимание и благоразумие. С уважением, администратор kniga-online.


Прокомментировать
Подтвердите что вы не робот:*
Подтвердите что вы не робот:*