Бен Голдакр - Вся правда о лекарствах. Мировой заговор фармкомпаний

68. This was SmithKline Beecham, before they merged with GlaxoWellcome and became GSK.

69. Strech D, Littmann J. Lack of proportionality. Seven specifications of public interest that override post-approval commercial interests on limited access to clinical data. Trials. 2012 Jul 2;13(1):100.

70. Lenzer J, Brownlee S. Antidepressants: an untold story? BMJ 2008;336:532-4.

71. Wood AJ. Progress and deficiencies in the registration of clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):824-830

72. O’Connor AB. The need for improved access to FDA reviews. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009;302(2):191.

73. http://www.prescrire.org/editoriaux/EDI33693.pdf

74. Decision of the European Ombudsman closing his inquiry into complaint 2560/2007/BEH against the European Medicines Agency. November 2010. http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/ cases/decision.faces/en/5459/html.bookmark.

75. UK drug regulator destroys all the evidence after 15 years/ BMI[Internet]. Available from http://www.bmj.com/ rapid-response/2011/11/03/uk-drug-regulator-destroys-allevidence-after-15-years.

76. You might be unsurprised to hear that no large drug company has ever been prosecuted under the safety monitoring regulations in the UK.

77. This story is spread over various publications by the Cochrane team, and the account here is taken from their work, published responses from Roche, and discussions with the Cochrane team. The best place to get the early half of this story is this paper: Doshi P. Neuraminidase inhibitors the story behind the Cochrane review. BMJ. 2009;339. And for the second half, I recommend this open-access paper: Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C (2012) The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience. PLoS Med 9(4): e1001201. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201 http://bit.ly/HIbwqO

78. This is a fascinating and messy new area. The paper below gives a good summary of the importance of analysing full trial programmes, and the discrepancies found on Tamiflu between papers and Clinical Study Reports: Jefferson T, Doshi P, Thompson M, Heneghan C, Group CARI. Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes? BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;342(jan11 1):c7258-c7258.

79. This is all from: Jefferson T, Doshi P, Thompson M, Heneghan C, Group CARI. Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes? BMJ. 2011 Jan 11;342(jan11 1):c7258-c7258.

80. Tom Jefferson, Lecture on Tamiflu, BMJ Evidence 2011, London.

81. Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):635-40.

82. Doshi P, Jefferson T, Del Mar C (2012) The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience. PLoS Med 9(4): e1001201. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201 http://bit.ly/HIbwqO

83. Cohen D (2009) Complications: tracking down the data on oseltamivir. BMJ 339: b5387.

84. If you’re interested in this story, the links to primary documents are all here: Diabetes drug ‘victory’ is really an ugly story about incompetence. Ben Goldacre, The Guardian. 2010 Jul 17 [cited 2012 May 2]; Available from: http://www.badscience.net/ 2010/07/pharmaco-epidemiology-would-be-fascinatingenougheven-if-society-didnt-manage-it-really-really-badly/

85. Nissen SE. Setting the record straight. JAMA. 2010 Mar 24; 303(12):1194-5

86. Eichler H-G, Abadie E, Breckenridge A, Leufkens H, Rasi G. Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators. PLoS Med. 2012 Apr 10;9(4):e100i202.

87. This is a vast story, told well elsewhere. Start with Curfman GD, Morrissey S, Drazen JM. Expression of concern reaffirmed. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1193.

88. Opinion: Misleading Drug Trials. The Scientist [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 15]. Available from: http://thescientist. com/2012/05/14/opinion-misleading-drug-trials/

89. The Yale Open Data Archive project, or YODA, is one good example of how this might look in the future.

1. I recommend the classic medical student textbook ‘Rang and Dale’: Rang & Dale’s Pharmacology. 6th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2007. But also this, on the regulatory process around early drug development: Friedhoff LT. New Drugs: An Insider’s Guide to the FDA’s New Drug Approval Process for Scientists, Investors and Patients. 1st ed. PSPG Publishing, 2009.

2. Elliott C, Abadie R. Exploiting a research underclass in phase 1 clinical trials. New England Tournal of Medicine. 2008;358(22):2316.

3. Cohen LP. To screen new drugs for safety, Lilly pays homeless alcoholics: it’s ‘quick cash’ to habitues of Indianapolis shelters; it vanishes quickly, too. Wall St J (East Ed). 1996 Nov 14;A1, A10.

4. Abadie R. The Professional Guinea Pig: Big Pharma and the Risky World of Human Subjects. 1st ed. Duke University Press, 2010.

5. Helms R, editor. Guinea Pig Zero: An Anthology of the Journal for Human Research Subjects. 1st ed. Garrett County Press; 2006.

6. Tucker T. Great Starvation Experiment: Ancel Keys and the Men Who Starved for Science. 1st University of Minnesota Press Ed. University of Minnesota Press; 2008.

7. Gorkin L, Schron EB, Handshaw K, Shea S, Kinney MR, Branyon M, et al. Clinical trial enrollers vs. nonenrollers: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) project. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):46–59.

8. Sheppard VB, Cox LS, Kanamori MJ, Canar J, Rodriguez Y, Goodman M, et al. BRIEF REPORT: If You Build It, They Will Come. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 May;20(5):444-7.

9. ACRO CRO Market [Internet]. [cited 2012 Feb 11].Available from: http://www.acrohealth.org/cro-market1.html.

10. MacDonald T, Hawkey C, Ford I. Time to treat as independent. BMJ. 2010 Nov 30;341(nov30 2):c6837-c6837.

11. Kassirer T. On the Take: How Medicine’s Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health. Ch 8. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, USA; 2004.

12. Pharmaceutical CSO — Pharmaceutical Commercialization — Quintiles [Internet.] Available from: http://www.quintiles.com/ commercial-services/

13. DRUG TESTING GOES OFFSHORE August 8, 2005 [Internet]. [cited 2012 Feb 11]. Available from: http://money.cnn.com/ magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/200 5/08/08/8267653/index. htm

14. Thiers FA, Sinskey AJ, Berndt ER. Trends in the globalization of clinical trials. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2008 Jan;7(1):13-4.

15. All of the issues around trials in developing countries are well covered in two books, Shah S. BODY HUNTERS, THE: Testing New Drugs on the World’s Poorest Patients. SCIE. THE NEW PRESS; 2007. And Petryna A. When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. 1st ed. Princeton University Press; 2009.

16. Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalization of Clinical Research Seth W. Glickman, M.D., M.B.A., John G. McHutchison, M.D., Eric D. Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., Charles B. Cairns, M.D., Robert A. Harrington, M.D., Robert M. Califf, M.D., and Kevin A. Schulman, M.D. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:816–823. February 19, 2009.

17. Bansal N. The opportunities and challenges in conducting clinical trials globally. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs. 2012 Feb 9;1–6.

18. Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalization of Clinical Research Seth W. Glickman, M.D., M.B.A., John G. McHutchison, M.D., Eric D. Peterson, M.D., M.P.H., Charles B. Cairns, M.D., Robert A. Harrington, M.D., Robert M. Califf, M.D., and Kevin A. Schulman, M.D. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:816–823. February 19, 2009

19. Hyder AA, Wali SA, Khan AN, Teoh NB, Kass NE, Dawson L. Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers. J Med Eth’cs. 2004 Feb;30(1):68–72.

20. Zhang D, Yin P, Freemantle N, Jordan R, Zhong N, Cheng KK. An assessment of the quality of randomised controlled trials conducted in China. Trials. 2008;9:22.

21. FDA Requires Foreign Clinical Studies be in Accordance with Good Clinical Practice to Better Protect Human Subjects by W. Thomas Smith American Bar Association Health eSource October 2008 Volume 5 Number 2 [Internet]. [cited 2012 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.americanbar.org/ newsletter/ publications/aba_health_esource_home/Volume5_0 2_smith. html

22. WikiLeaks cables: Pfizer ‘used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout’ Business The Guardian [Internet]. [cited 2012 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/ dec/09/wikileaks-cables-pfizer-nigeria

23. US embassy cable Monday 20 April 2009, 16:00, Abuja 000671 ‘Pfizer reaches preliminary agreement for $75m settlement’ [cited 2012 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/ world/us-embassy-cablesdocuments/203205

24. WikiLeaks cables: Pfizer ‘used dirty tricks to avoid clinical trial payout’ Business The Guardian [Internet]. [cited 2012 Feb 11]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/ 2010/ dec/09/wikileaks-cables-pfizer-nigeria

25. Jonathan Kimmelman, Charles Weijer, and Eric M Meslin, ‘Helsinki discords: FDA, ethics, and international drug trials,’ The Lancet 373, no. 9657 (January 3, 2009): 13–14.

26. Goodyear MDE, Lemmens T, Sprumont D, Tangwa G. Does the FDA have the authority to trump the Declaration of Helsinki? BMJ. 2009 Apr 21;338(apr21 1):b1559-b1559.

1. Royal College of Physicians, London UK. INNOVATING FOR HEALTH. Patients, physicians, the pharmaceutical industry and the NHS. February 2009. Report of a Working Party.

2. If you’re very confused about the European Medicines Agency, and the UK MHRA, and how they relate to each other, it’s fairly simple. The MHRA used to approve drugs, now the EMA do, but they farm out some of the local work to the old national regulators, especially monitoring and communication, as well as some of the approval stuff.

3. I recommend the work of John Abraham, collected here: (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/profiles/6

4. Owen BM, Braeutigam R. The Regulation Game: Strategic Use of the Administrative Process. Ballinger Pub Co; 1978. Via Abraham J. On the prohibition of conflicts of interest in pharmaceutical regulation: Precautionary limits and permissive challenges. A commentary on Sismondo (66:9, 2008, 1909-14) and O’Donovan and Lexchin. Social Science & Medicine. 2010 Mar;70(5):648-51.

5. http://www.alter-eu.org/sites/default/files/documents/lonngrendoc.pdf

6. http://www.alter-eu.org/sites/default/files/documents/lonngrendoc.pdf

7. http://www.alter-eu.org/fr/press-releases/2011/02/25/conflictof-interest-case-involving-ex-ema-director

8. http://www.corporateeurope.org/publications/block-revolvingdoor

9. Lurie, P., Almeida, C., Stine, N., Stine, A. R., & Wolfe, S. M. (2006). Financial conflict of interest disclosure and voting patterns at food and drug administration drug advisory committee meetings. JAMA, 295, 1921e1928.

10. If you’re interested in starting on this, the following are a good place to start: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/25/health/ policy/25knee.html?_r=1; http://www.nytimes.com/ 2005/02/25/ politics/25fda.html. And the work of the Project On Government Oversight is excellent, led by the researcher who worked on Senator Grassley’s reports into the pharmaceutical industry: http://www.pogo.org/ investigations/public-health/fda.html; http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2011/08/fdas-janetwoodcock-thesubstance-behind-her-nonsubstantivesubstantive — ties-to-industry.html

11. Light D, editor. The Risks of Prescription Drugs (A Columbia/ SSRC Book. Columbia University Press; 2010).

12. Survey of FDA Scientists Shows They Feel Pressure to Exclude…: Oncology Times [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 6]. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2006/08250/Survey_of_FDA_Scientists_Shows_T hey_ Feel_Pressure.8.aspx

13. USATODAY.com Survey: FDA scientists question safety [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 6]. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2004-12-16-fda-surveyusat_x.htm

14. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2011 10.1007/ s00228-011-1052-1 Anything new in EU pharmacovigilance? Silvio Garattini and Vittorio Bertele’.

15. Goldberg NH, Schneeweiss S, Kowal MK, Gagne JJ. Availability of Comparative Efficacy Data at the Time of Drug Approval in the United States. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011 May 4;305(17):1786-9.

16. Bertele’ V, Banzi R, Gluud C, Garattini S. EMA’s reflection on placebo does not reflect patients’ interests. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology [Internet]. 2011 Dec 2 [cited 2012 Feb 13]; Epub ahead of print. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/4j733734v35381jk/

17. Garattini S, Chalmers I. Patients and the public deserve big changes in evaluation of drugs. BMJ. 2009 Mar 31;338(mar313):b1025b1025.

18. Van Luijn JCF, Gribnau FWJ, Leufkens HGM. Availability of comparative trials for the assessment of new medicines in the European Union at the moment of market authorization. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(2):159–162.

19. Stafford RS, Wagner TH, Lavori PW. New, but Not Improved? Incorporating Comparative-Effectiveness Information into FDA Labeling. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 12;NEJMp0906490.

20. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar;324(12):781–788.

21. ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2000 Apr;283(15):1967–1975.

22. Lenzer J. Spin doctors soft pedal data on antihypertensives. BMJ. 2003 Jan 18;326(7381):170.

23. Vilsboll T, Christensen M, Junker AE, Knop FK, Gluud LL. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on weight loss: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012 Jan 11;344(jan10 2):d7771-d7771.

24. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Surrogate end points in clinical research: hazardous to your health. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1114-8.

25. This graph is from Chapter 7 of an excellent (though long and serious) history of the FDA: Carpenter D. Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press; 2010.

26. Mitka M. FDA Takes Slow Road Toward Withdrawal of Drug Approved With Fast-Track Process. JAMA. 2011 Mar 9;305(10):982-4.

27. Press Announcements > FDA Proposes Withdrawal of Low Blood Pressure Drug [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 7]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/ PressAnnouncements/ucm222580.htm

28. United States Government Accountability Office. September 2009. NEW DRUG APPROVAL. FDA Needs to Enhance Its Oversight of Drugs Approved on the Basis of Surrogate Endpoints. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09866.pdf